September 2026 Edition

CV Score Statistics: What 1,615 Real CVs Show

Each month we publish what our free CV Score tool finds in the CVs people check with it. This edition covers 1,615 CVs checked between 10 September 2026 and 30 September 2026. Every figure comes from our own data, and the method further down shows how each one was counted.

This is the September 2026 edition, published on 30 September 2026. Its figures are fixed and won't be revised.

Key Figures

74.5%
74.5% of CVs had no LinkedIn URL, or fewer than four of the five basic contact details.
64.8%
64.8% of CVs failed our quantified results check, with too few recent roles backed by a figure.
21.5%
21.5% of CVs scored 80 or more out of 100.

Share of the 1,615 CVs checked between 10 September 2026 and 30 September 2026. The quantified results figure only counts the CVs that check applies to.

How Scores Are Spread

Under 507.4%
50 to 7971.1%
80 and over21.5%
How Scores Are Spread
Under 507.4%
50 to 7971.1%
80 and over21.5%

Scores out of 100, across 1,615 CVs.

Median Score by CV Language

Median score out of 100, by the language each CV is written in.

Englishn = 13275/100
Frenchn = 1,09966/100
Spanishn = 35065/100
Median Score by CV Language
English75/100n = 132
French66/100n = 1,099
Spanish65/100n = 350

Languages with fewer than 30 CVs in this edition aren't shown.

The Checks CVs Fail Most

Share of CVs failing each check, highest first. A partial pass, which the tool shows as a warning, counts as a fail.

Contact details74.5%

No LinkedIn URL, or fewer than four of these five: name, email, phone, city or country, LinkedIn.

n = 1,615

Quantified results64.8%

Fewer than two of the three most recent roles include a figure, such as a percentage, an amount or a headcount (one role is enough for graduates, and student CVs always pass).

n = 1,574: trades CVs aren't scored on this check

Skills section63.0%

Too few or too many skills listed. For experienced candidates the target is 8 to 15, with lower ranges for students and graduates.

n = 1,615

Summary55.4%

No summary, or one that isn't three to five sentences long.

n = 1,615

Overused phrases18.3%

At least one phrase from our list of overused CV wording, such as "results-driven" or "team player".

n = 1,615

Experience descriptions16.3%

Fewer than three roles (or not all of them, when the CV lists under three) have a description of at least 50 characters.

n = 1,615

Section structure13.9%

At least one of the five core sections is missing: contact details, summary, experience, education or skills.

n = 1,615

The Checks CVs Fail Most
Contact details74.5%n = 1,615No LinkedIn URL, or fewer than four of these five: name, email, phone, city or country, LinkedIn.
Quantified results64.8%n = 1,574Fewer than two of the three most recent roles include a figure, such as a percentage, an amount or a headcount (one role is enough for graduates, and student CVs always pass).
Skills section63.0%n = 1,615Too few or too many skills listed. For experienced candidates the target is 8 to 15, with lower ranges for students and graduates.
Summary55.4%n = 1,615No summary, or one that isn't three to five sentences long.
Overused phrases18.3%n = 1,615At least one phrase from our list of overused CV wording, such as "results-driven" or "team player".
Experience descriptions16.3%n = 1,615Fewer than three roles (or not all of them, when the CV lists under three) have a description of at least 50 characters.
Section structure13.9%n = 1,615At least one of the five core sections is missing: contact details, summary, experience, education or skills.

How We Measured This

This edition covers every CV run through our free CV Score tool from 10 September 2026 at 00:00 to 30 September 2026 at 09:10 UTC for which a score was saved: 1,615 CVs, whether or not the person went on to create an account. We count checks, not people, so a CV checked twice counts twice. The statistics only use the score and the pass or fail result of each check, never the text of the CV, a name or contact details.

Each CV gets a score out of 100 from eight checks: format, section structure, contact details, quantified results, skills, experience descriptions, overused phrases and summary. The score uses all eight. The list of checks above leaves out format (multi-column layouts) while we confirm how reliable that detection is. Trades CVs aren't scored on quantified results, and that weight moves to experience descriptions.

CVs checked before 10 September 2026 aren't included, because we changed the scoring rules at the start of that month and older scores aren't comparable. From October 2026 each edition covers one calendar month, and past editions stay online at their own address with their figures unchanged.

These are CVs from people who chose to check them with us, and the mix of languages follows who uses the tool (see the sample sizes above), so the figures describe that group rather than every job seeker. We publish aggregates only: no figure here rests on fewer than 30 CVs, and nothing identifies a person, an employer or a job ad.

How to Cite This Data

You're welcome to quote these figures. Please name Personal Job Coach as the source, with the edition and a link to the page:

Personal Job Coach, "CV Score Statistics", September 2026 edition, https://personaljobcoach.com/cv-score-stats/2026-09
Permanent link to this edition:
CV Score Statistics, September 2026 Edition
Latest edition, updated monthly:
CV Score Statistics, Latest edition

All Editions

See Where Your Own CV Lands

Run your own CV through the same eight checks and see the full breakdown.

Score My CV